Re: Peculiar Win/11 Behavior?

"David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.lispworks.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Well, Linux, Mac OS, and WIndows, all have things running in the background. What is it about Linux that allows you to prevent interference? How do you do that?




> On Jan 17, 2025, at 03:12, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Windows tend to do background patch downloads as well as some security tools like antivirus or antimalware scanners might get involved.
> For such workload you are describing i will most probably use linux machine so i can prevent such behavior.
> 
> Not to mention that on company laptop sometimes there is some processing that will freeze whole experience for almost 30 seconds….
> 
> 
> Ladislav Koščo 
> 
> 
>> On 17 Jan 2025, at 11:02, David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I am doing a long running data collection process, all written in Lisp, on a Win/11 system.
>> 
>> I notice that there are periods in the evening when my acquisitions suffer some phase discontinuities, which cause the data to exhibit higher than normal statistical variances. And often, on the longest duration collections, the system loses phase coherence completely, requiring that I shutdown the Lisp app and restart it to clear things up. There seems to develop a permanent disjunction between the Lisp data requests and the underlying Windows I/O system. That has to be my fault, but after instrumenting the system, I have yet to find hard evidence of where that happens and when.
>> 
>> My timings between data buffer requests should all be less than 500 ms. They normally range between 4-20 ms. Last night I see in the historical record there was one instance of a delay of 486 ms - almost long enough to lose phase coherency, which seems to have happened around 11 pm local time. It is now almost 3 am local time.
>> 
>> The Lisp code is completely asynchronous, but there is nothing that should be causing isolated instances of delays 20x longer than the nominal max of 20 ms.
>> 
>> I’m running the system with Sleep deferred while data collection activities are under way. So ports going to sleep should not be a problem. The screen remains lit up the entire time and no screen saver gets instantiated.
>> 
>> So, I’m wondering if anyone else sees erratic behavior in the evenings with Windows/11? Could there be some daemon scheduled to run at night that causes I/O activity to go bonkers from a regular precise schedule? Is Windows so totally bolluxed that it is insane to be attempting scientific data collection with it?
>> 
>> (We used to have dedicated VME crates with our own processors and realtime OS to do this kind of work.)
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html


_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
[email protected]
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.