Re: Anyone understand this?

More properly, it appears to be a bug in FLI::SET-DYNAMIC-LISP-ARRAY-POINTER, which is part of the macro expansion.




> On Jan 22, 2025, at 12:10, David McClain <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It appears now that the fault actually lies with FLI:WITH-DYNAMIC-LISP-ARRAY-POINTER. 
> 
> Using this code to produce a dummy second pointer with explicit :START 0, alongside the actual pointer of interest with a non-zero :START parameter, and then stepping through this code with a breakpoint set where the pointers are created, shows that both pointers produce identical FLI:POINTER objects. There is no base + offset in a composite object. The POINTER is expected to have a reduced direct address. And the two pointers do not differ when they ought to be different.
> 
> So looks like a bug in FLI:WITH-DYNAMIC-LISP-ARRAY-POINTER.
> 
> (defun vdot (arr1 arr2 &key (start2 0))
>   ;; intended for pre-decimation FIR filtering, where:
>   ;;   arr1 = FIR filter kernel
>   ;;   arr2 = input data buffer
>   ;;   nel  = length of FIR filter (ntaps)
>   ;;   start2 = starting position in data buffer for filtering,
>   ;;            as kernel steps along by ndec
>   (declare (array (double-float *) arr1 arr2))
>   (fli:with-dynamic-foreign-objects ()
>     (let ((ans (fli:allocate-dynamic-foreign-object :type :double-float)))
>       (hcl:with-pinned-objects (arr2)
>         (fli:with-dynamic-lisp-array-pointer (parr arr2 :type :double-float :start start2)
>           (fli:with-dynamic-lisp-array-pointer (parrx arr2 :type :double-float :start 0)
>             (_vdsp-dotprd arr1 1 parr 1 ans (length arr1))
>             (inspect (list parr parrx))
>             (fli:dereference ans)))
>         ))))
> 
> #|
> (let* ((arr2 (make-array 5
>                          :element-type 'double-float
>                          :allocation :pinnable
>                          :initial-contents '(1d0 2d0 3d0 4d0 5d0)))
>        (arr1 (make-array 3
>                          :element-type 'double-float
>                          :allocation :pinnable
>                          :initial-contents '(10d0 20d0 30d0))))
>   (vdot arr1 arr2 :start2 1)) ;; should produce 200.0, but produces 140.0.
> |#
> 
> 
>> On Jan 22, 2025, at 11:57, Yuri Davidovsky (as work at disclosure dot ie) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> That’s some classy email formatting. 
>> 
>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 18:52, David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com) <[email protected]> wrote…
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
>