Re: Gradual Growth of Memory Use?
"David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, you are correct about displaced arrays. I did think of that while doing my errands, then promptly forgot about it during the rewrite. Thanks!! And yes, I removed the GC-GENERATION. That’s why I think the memory is crawling higher due to some working threshold down in the GC despite my ephemeral use of vectors all over the place. > On Mar 13, 2025, at 14:31, Yuri Davidovsky (as work at disclosure dot ie) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 13 Mar 2025, at 21:04, David McClain <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Still have to SUBSEQ for most plotting (no need to see everything unless specifically requested with SHOW-ALL or REGRESS-ALL). > > This could be a use case for displaced arrays here to optimise it further, as long as typed arrays allow that (not sure if it is the case though). > > _______________________________________________ > Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users > [email protected] > http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html