Re: If it looks like a bug and smells like a bug .....
"Paul Werkowski (as pw at snoopy dot qozzy dot com)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I repeal my bug comment. A revision: (defclass record () ((s1 :initarg :x) (s2 :initarg :y))) (defgeneric some-fcn (stream record-type &rest initargs)) (defmethod some-fcn (stream record-type &rest initargs) (declare (ignore stream)) (print initargs) (apply 'make-instance record-type initargs)) (defun test1 () (some-fcn t 'record :x 1 :y 2)) CL-USER 20 > (test1) (:X 1 :Y 2) #<RECORD 4010068E5B> On 5/5/2025 12:43 PM, Tim Bradshaw (as tfb at cley dot com) wrote: > On 5 May 2025, at 15:43, Michał phoe Herda (as phoe at disroot dot org) <[email protected]> wrote: >> No, they do not appear before &KEY, they appear right where they should > ... and in particular if that was legal then a function specified like that would have to accept any keyword arguments whatsoever, because the disallowed ones could always 'appear before &key'. That would be very bad. > > --tim > > _______________________________________________ > Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users > [email protected] > http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html