Re: Naive DEFSYSTEM replacement
"Marco Antoniotti (as marco dot antoniotti at unimib dot it)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG0Nw2=HgOn1OjcxLzFJPf7-qJ3WSeQJ-Z=RHQr+vSRefN_C0g@mail.gmail.com> |
Code walker (and more)? Somebody already went down that rabbit’s hole. Shameless plug. https://clast.sourceforge.net/ Cheers MA Marco Antoniotti https://dcb.disco.unimib.it On Sat, 26 Jul 2025 at 02:33, Adam Weaver (as adam at cleversure dot com dot au) <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2025-07-25 at 12:43 -0400, Bradford Miller wrote: > > > > > > If this is a major concern to you, my suggestion would be to figure > > out a tool that would help solve these problems absent knowing the > > intentions of the programmer (sure, it’s undecidable in general, but > > any progress would be something). Alternatively you can define a > > metalanguage that can be used to state the programmers intentions > > explicitly, perhaps in a nice (declare …) term. > > > > Such a tool would be a great contribution to the community (both > > lispers specifically, and general computer science, I expect). > > You want a code walker? Yeah I'm not going down that rabbit hole. :) > > So it sounds like it's just me. ASDF:DEFSYSTEM and LW:DEFSYSTEM and > probably MK:DEFSYSTEM do something I don't want (automatic > recompilation), so they skimp on they thing I *do* want (figuring out > dependencies). > > Fair enough, we make trade-offs all the time. > > A > > _______________________________________________ > Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users > [email protected] > http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html >