Re: Naive DEFSYSTEM replacement
"James Cloos (as cloos at jhcloos dot com)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "CS" == Christopher Stacy (as cstacy at dtpq dot com) <[email protected]> writes: CS> Yes. Because people could not be convinced that all the hair of the CS> Lisp Machine pathname system could be needed to deal with all the CS> variant operating (file) systems. CS> Turns out, it *was* necessary. CS> But X3J13 just punted. what was left out? iow, what would be different. -JimC -- James Cloos <[email protected]> OpenPGP: https://jhcloos.com/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html