Re: map-pane[-descendant]-children
Martin Simmons <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, that is true. I don't know if it was designed like that deliberately, but changing now might cause problems. We will rewrite that part of the documentation to make it clearer. -- Martin Simmons LispWorks Ltd http://www.lispworks.com/ >>>>> On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 19:21:07 +0200, Didier Verna (as didier at didierverna dot net) said: > > Hi! > > FWIW, I find that the documentation of these two functions is a bit > misleading. The way I read it first, I thought that the traversal was > unconditional, and the mapping function only applied when the :test > succeeded. > > However, experimentation seems to indicate that a pane failing the :test > will /not/ be traversed. I had to move a test from the :test keyword to > within the mapping function to realize that... > > My 2c. > > -- > Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. > > Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info > > _______________________________________________ > Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users > [email protected] > http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html > _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html