Re: GETF Speedup?
"Yuri Davidovsky (as work at disclosure dot ie)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 11 Oct 2025, at 04:27, David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com) <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am delighted that GETF is so efficient now. It really needs to be, given functions with keyword argument lists. Hm. Would you be able to share the test code? I wonder how that could be done given that lists have to be traversed sequentially to find the value. If anything, that could be saying that hash tables are not as fast as they probably should be, which is not good since a package symbol lookup is essentially a hash table search, as I understand it. Also, did you happen to profile assoc lists while at that to see how they compare to plists? _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html