Re: Timing Comparison?

> Hm. Could you post a before/after example? I bet others would be quite interested to hear it too. I doubt it would be possible to reverse engineer the algorithm just from its output, so it should be safe on that front.

As I said before, the algorithm has been patented, which means that all the technical details have now been made public - sufficient for someone versed in the art to reproduce what we did. So no longer any need to hide how it works.

Using the algorithm also makes it possible to hold a normal conversation on a cell phone when standing in the midst of rush hour traffic, of seated in a stadium behind the goal posts during a touchdown, or any number of other noisy situations. And you don’t need to hold your other hand over your other ear.

This was the patented magic. And it works for everyone, because that ambient noise field causes your hearing to become like someone who has sensioneural hearing impairment.



> On Nov 3, 2025, at 06:03, Yuri Davidovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 3 Nov 2025, at 13:56, David McClain <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, I found the (simplest) equations that describe the whole of human hearing, both normal and impaired, and developed an algorithm to compensate sensioneural hearing impairment. The algorithm spectrally pre-warps incoming sound so that it retains proper timbre balance among harmonic partials. This is more than a mere cochlear model, which only addresses our “microphones”.
>> 
>> The result is that oboes continue to sound like oboes, and not like muted Jazz trumpets.
> 
> Hm. Could you post a before/after example? I bet others would be quite interested to hear it too. I doubt it would be possible to reverse engineer the algorithm just from its output, so it should be safe on that front.
> 
> Should it work on laptop speakers, or proper speakers/headphones are required?