Re: unboxed structure fields (or class slots)
"David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My experiences so far with LLMs is that they are essentially deaf to constructive criticism - by that I mean, they profusely apologize and often reframe the discussion usefully, but that the interaction of correction does not become assimilated into their long-term character. I suppose I could waste an hour to verify this by logging into another account and asking the original question again… But I honestly don’t see a path for corrections to their database (i.e., Perceptron weight matrices) based on daily interactions. Perhaps a local database is held whereby future interactions in the same login account will receive some corrections along the way? > On Jan 12, 2026, at 06:30, Tim Bradshaw (as tfb at tfeb dot org) <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8 Jan 2026, at 11:02, wojciech.pasieka (as wojciech dot pasieka at ai dot pressiton dot com) (Adrian W. Pasieka) <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Gemini's says both: 'YES' and 'NO'. > > LLM gives useless answer: news at 11. > > >