Re: Question: LispWorks IDE with different CL engine?
"Tim Bradshaw (as tfb at cley dot com)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The question is not whether you can persuade the LW IDE to talk to SBCL but what use is that, and is is worth the candle? If you're using the LW IDE you have a high-quality, deeply integrated CL right there, in the same Lisp image as the IDE. That gives you most of the things people liked about LispMs: the LW IDE is, by margin, the closest thing to using a LispM I know of (it's not very like a LispM in interface but the all-in-one-image thing is a big deal). Getting an implementation that is sitting at the end of a bit of string to be anything like that nice is going to be ... well, good luck with it I think we need to know what OP wants to achieve.