Re: Numbered backups

"Christopher Stacy (as cstacy at dtpq dot com)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.lispworks.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2/12/26 7:16 PM, Tim Bradshaw wrote:
> Almost yes.  I mean, obviously actually no because those systems have been excessively romanticised since they died (I only used twenex while they were alive), but it should be possible for filesystems to provide this functionality.
>
> --tim

The Lisp Machine file system (LMFS) was the pinnacle of those; it 
captured the features of the older ones I mentioned and improved upon 
them a bit. I am not sure what you mean by "romanticized". I guess you 
mean that some people complain that Unix (and the variants we're using 
today) and Windows have far more primitive -- I would say "impoverished" 
-- file systems? It doesn't seem like romanticism to me; it just seems 
like being stuck in a shitty situation, after having been in a better 
one. Perhaps you disagree. I would be genuinely curious: Why do you 
think the present situation is better?



_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
[email protected]
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.