Re: Metaclass & McCLIM revisited

Hey,

I've made the necessary changes to the metaclass used in McCLIM.
Generally LW does not follow MOP in various regards, I had to use
Closer MOP and still add a tweak, because LispWorks seems to overwride
whatever is stored in mop:standard-instance-access (probably some
optimization). That's why I had to provide "non-standard" location
to store objects implementing thread-local values.

Are there plans for LispWorks to improve MOP conformance, or is that
not a goal (i.e because that'd degrade the performance)?

Best regards,
Daniel

_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
[email protected]
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html