Re: A MOP minimisation question
"David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I realise this is an ideological question: assume I would rather minimise my code's exposure to the MOP even if using it is The Right Thing. This is a puzzling statement… Lisp, of all languages, needs OOP least of all. You can do entirely without MOP or CLOS by just using clever lambda closures. So what are you really trying to say here? _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html