Re: A MOP minimisation question
"Didier Verna (as didier at didierverna dot net)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com)" <[email protected]> wrote: > This is a puzzling statement… Lisp, of all languages, needs OOP least > of all. You can do entirely without MOP or CLOS by just using clever > lambda closures. Now *that* is a puzzling statement. In a world of turing-complete languages, you can do entirely without any high level paradigm at all. -- Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated. Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html