Re: A MOP minimisation question
"Tim Bradshaw (as tfb at cley dot com)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11 Mar 2026, at 19:16, Pascal Bourguignon (as informatimago at gmail dot com) <[email protected]> wrote: > > You may use the prototype instance of the class but it exists only if the class is finalized, hence pain sometimes. Classes have to be finalized by the tine macros get expanded because their inheritance needs to be known to compute the array layout, which is one of the parts of the MOP I need to use. prototype instances then seem like just as much of an additional MOP dependence as just relying on class slots. I think I've convinced myself that what I'm now doing is close enough to OK as not to be worth fixing. --tim _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html