RE: Defsystem
"Adam Weaver (as adam at cleversure dot com dot au)" <[email protected]> Thu, 14 May 2026 00:30:28 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <SY5P282MB4638B612F3603BBB782C29099C072@SY5P282MB4638.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> |
Matthew Weber (as matthew dot weber at yonayonayona dot net) > > I notice that there's support for a native lispworks defsystem. Are there any > advantages or tradeoffs to consider for why this might be used over asdf's > implementation? Well if you don't care about portability between different lisp implementations, and only want to support LW, then LW:DEFSYSTEM is perfectly cromulent, and it's built-in to LW. Personally, those trade-offs are fine for me. But I don't like LW:DEFYSYSTEM's syntax so much ... so https://git.sr.ht/~adamweaver/lw-loader The Real Experts around here will now chime in to tell me that I'm wrong. A. _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html