Re: Finding the applicable methods...

"David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com)" <[email protected]> Tue, 14 Jul 2026 15:08:33 -0700

Newsgroups	gmane.lisp.lispworks.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Yes, you are right… I reluctantly surrendered to the typed STRUCT, aka without (:TYPE VECTOR). 

That gives me the chance to use the LW Inspect to show multiple different views of a RB-TREE, including a nice graphical view, thanks to the LW GRAPH pane.




> On Jul 14, 2026, at 14:48, Tim Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 14 Jul 2026, at 22:20, David McClain (as dbm at refined-audiometrics dot com) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I am tempted to conclude that there is no difference in speed, and a small’ish cost in memory using the DEFSTRUCT without the (:TYPE VECTOR).
> 
> On the other hand there's the cost of there not being a useful type / class.  (I am not saying that this might not be a price worth paying!)


_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
[email protected]
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html