Re: Timers: absolute vs relative
Martin Simmons <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:41:53 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lispworks.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It is trying to define what 0 means, which is the time that the LispWorks OS process started in this case. I suggest just using the relative version. -- Martin Simmons LispWorks Ltd http://www.lispworks.com/ >>>>> On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:57:12 +0200, Marco Antoniotti (as marco dot antoniotti at unimib dot it) said: > > Hi > > I am dabbling with timers, but I am a bit confused by the documentation. > > The documentation for schedule-timer says "Schedules a timer to expire at a > given time after the start of the program." > The one for schedule-timer-relative says "Schedules a timer to expire at a > given time after this function is called." > > While the "relative" form is rather clear and intuitive (get the current > time schedule to timer x seconds later), I am a bit at a loss for the > absolute version. How exactly do you get the "start of the program"? > > Shall I just use the relative version? > > Thanks > > -- > Marco Antoniotti, Professor, Director tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01 > DISCo, University of Milan-Bicocca U14 2043 http://dcb.disco.unimib.it > Viale Sarca 336 > I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY > > REGAINS: https://regains.disco.unimib.it/ > _______________________________________________ Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users [email protected] http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html