Re: Timers: absolute vs relative

Martin Simmons <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Jul 2026 19:41:53 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.lispworks.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It is trying to define what 0 means, which is the time that the LispWorks OS
process started in this case.

I suggest just using the relative version.

-- 
Martin Simmons
LispWorks Ltd
http://www.lispworks.com/



>>>>> On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:57:12 +0200, Marco Antoniotti (as marco dot antoniotti at unimib dot it) said:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I am dabbling with timers, but I am a bit confused by the documentation.
> 
> The documentation for schedule-timer says "Schedules a timer to expire at a
> given time after the start of the program."
> The one for schedule-timer-relative says "Schedules a timer to expire at a
> given time after this function is called."
> 
> While the "relative" form is rather clear and intuitive (get the current
> time schedule to timer x seconds later), I am a bit at a loss for the
> absolute version.  How exactly do you get the "start of the program"?
> 
> Shall I just use the relative version?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -- 
> Marco Antoniotti, Professor, Director         tel. +39 - 02 64 48 79 01
> DISCo, University of Milan-Bicocca U14 2043   http://dcb.disco.unimib.it
> Viale Sarca 336
> I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY
> 
> REGAINS: https://regains.disco.unimib.it/
> 

_______________________________________________
Lisp Hug - the mailing list for LispWorks users
[email protected]
http://www.lispworks.com/support/lisp-hug.html