Re: Re: widget toolkits
Raymond Martin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lush.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I did some more reading today on what the Enlightenment folks are up to and their EFL (Enlightenment Foundation Library) seems to have good potential. They have full X support in their Ecore which wraps X, OpenGL, Framebuffers, and so on. Not to mention that the enlightenment code has included transparency and alpha-blending almost from its inception (back in 2000 it was already there). The intrinisic imaging library imlib was the basis of Gtk+ before it changed over to gdk_pixbuf. Now the enlightenment team has totally rewritten imlib as imlib2 and promises that it is the fastest imaging library around, beating anything offered for use in Gtk+ or qt as examples. Another selling point is that I see they are thinking about adding a qt backend in EFL. The code is already ported across Linux, Solaris, SGI, FreeBSD, etc. Sure it's possible from Lush to use external widget toolkits, but why bother? It's great to have a dynamic and RAD GUI such as Ogre and I think it would much better serve the cause of Lush to extend Ogre than just to interface to a different set of GUI widgets. Raymond __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf