Re: Unstable files/documentation & package formats
Raymond Martin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lush.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Why not simply making a CVS branch. This exactly what it does... Of course you can do that with CVS, but in my opinion it is something of a hassle when you are just doing quick and dirty stuff. In the case of the documentation, I might have just one file changed that I want to put up where everyone one can get at it. Perhaps I will get numerous feedback about typos and such which can be updated quickly, but serve little purpose in CVS for revision control. The sourceforge project file web interface just seems a little more accessible for this purpose. I am not trying to complicate issues by my suggestion and perhaps this is not the way things have traditionally been done. Maybe a little change in packaging/file management/availability will open things up to more participation. If not, no real harm done (CVS and tar.gz remain in place throughout). And of course I am quite willing to help out. Since I am making these suggestions I am ready to make packages and manage the files I'll upload in accord with requirements, as well as keep the devel/user lists notified of any changes. Raymond __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf