Re: Unstable files/documentation & package formats

Raymond Martin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.lush.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Why not simply making a CVS branch. This exactly what it does...

Of course you can do that with CVS, but in my opinion it is something of a hassle
when you are just doing quick and dirty stuff. In the case of the documentation,
I might have just one file changed that I want to put up where everyone one can 
get at it. Perhaps I will get numerous feedback about typos and such which can
be updated quickly, but serve little purpose in CVS for revision control.

The sourceforge project file web interface just seems a little more accessible for 
this purpose.

I am not trying to complicate issues by my suggestion and perhaps this is not the 
way things have traditionally been done. Maybe a little change in packaging/file 
management/availability will open things up to more participation. If not, no real
harm done (CVS and tar.gz remain in place throughout). And of course I am quite
willing to help out. Since I am making these suggestions I am ready to make
packages and manage the files I'll upload in accord with requirements, as well as
keep the devel/user lists notified of any changes.


Raymond
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.