suggestion on class constructors

Hi,

I propose a change in the way class constructors are defined.
Right now, if no constructor is explicitly defined, the default
constructor is 'new-empty'. It would be more useful, I think,
to take the constructor of the superclass as default constructor.

Ralf



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf