Re: lexical scoping (was: JPush)
Yann LeCun <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.lush.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Courant Institute, NYU |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 08:26 pm, Ralf Juengling wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Yann LeCun wrote: > > - lexical scoping (it's better for compiling) > > What are your ideas for an evolutionary approach towards > lexical scoping? What are the problems with adding lexical > scoping to the language? There is no funcdamental problem with adding lexical scoping. There is a slight problem with doing it in a way that doesn't break existing code. Some libraries actually rely on dynamic binding (e.g. Ogre, the documentation, parts of the compiler...), so we can't just replace dynamic by lexical. We would have to have access to both systems (like common Lisp, Perl, etc). -- Yann ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php