Re: mixing lush with clush

Actually, the best fix is probably to extend (or rewrite) the 
compiler so that everything can be compiled. This means adding 
a garbage collector for compiled code, among other things.

  -- Yann


On Thursday 16 March 2006 08:19 pm, Yury Sulsky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking- I really like Lush proper, but CLush is basically just
> prefix C with a better macro system. The problem is that you can't
> have code paths that include interpreted portions, so you have to
> decide a priori how much of your program will be compiled.
>
> It seems like the fix for this is to improve the C-->LISP interface so
> that calls to non-compilable code can be automatically marshalled by
> the compiler (something you can already do by hand when writing inline
> C).
>
> Any comments/suggestions where to get started?
>
> Thanks
> Yury
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd________________________________________
>_______ Lush-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lush-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642