Re: mixing lush with clush

> I don't know. Why does it have to have an extra 'C side' object
> for every 'Lisp side' object? Are there other reasons than the
> option to compile standalone executables?

Well, the lisp side needs a bunch of tags to indicate the 
type of the objects.

Ideally, the lisp side structure would be identical to the
"natural" C side structure. Currently, this is not the case
(hence the inefficient difference between an "index" [lisp side
matrix] and an "idx" [C side matrix]).

  -- Yann



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642