future string representation?

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Leon Bottou wrote:

> One could make more general string utilities available
> and reimplement these using the more general facilities.
> The question is to define what general facilities should be available.

Strings in compiled code are represented differently than
in the interpreter. Are there plans for making both sides
use the same representation?

ralf



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642