Re: mixing lush with clush

On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Yury Sulsky wrote:

> my delirium I decided it'd be a good idea to write a type inferencer
> for lush. I'm halfway done with that.

cool.

> One problem I've run into is that there are a billion primitives in
> Lush. Both the type inferencing and C compilation would be much easier
> if we had a strict set on top of which everything is built. How about:
>
> let let* lambda mlambda -- does anything else create a new lexical scope?
> defparameter defvar setq
> quote declare scope
> cond and or not = == >

you want to implement if-else in terms of cond, not the other way
around?

> selectq while progn idx-gloop idx-eloop

you have progn whith let


> eval apply cinline
> * + - / div mod bitand bitor bitxor bitshl bitshr
>
> Am I missing anything?

cons, car, cdr, consp, null
classof

what about other mathematical functions?
what about constructors of builtin types (htable, make-array, etc.)
and primitives specific to those types?

Ralf



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642