Re: cside representation of strings

On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Yann LeCun wrote:

>>> Merging would certainly make a lot of sense.
>>
>> Ok. We need to decide how we want work together in terms
>> of source control tools and dealing with backward
>> incompatible changes.
>
> Perhaps the simplest way would be to create a lush-2.0 branch on the
> sourcrforge CVS and start moving stuff there.

I have a couple of things in the pipeline for psu-lush 1.3.
Let me finish this and psu-lush 1.3 could be the point of
departure for lush 2.0. What do you think?
For those who wanted to start working on lush 2.0 right away
could do so by branching off of the current psu-lush 1.3, my
Arch repository is at ftp://ftp.cs.pdx.edu/pub/juenglin/2005.

Ralf


>> What I wanted to suggest earlier: Since I made many changes
>> in psu-lush that break compatibility (and there are a few
>> more I want to do) maybe now is the time to make some of
>> the incompatible changes you have on your list as well.
>
> Certainly. In particular, it might be a good idea to come up
> with better naming conventions for idx functions. PSU-Lush
> is closer to this than plain Lush.
>
>> Do you mind cc-ing to lush-devel?
>
> Not at all. Perhaps we will get some spontaneous volunteers to help,
> and we might get some good ideas from people.
>
>  -- Yann
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/