Re: Can we distribute non-GPLed code with Lush?

> >Indeed everything seems to be legit even according to members of
> >debian-legal.
> Thanks, that's good to know. I have included some non-GPLed code
> myself and there might be more that I am not aware of.
Just an additional remark -- it is crucial to separate there free
but not GPL-compatible and  GPL-compatible licenses.

> I think it is a good idea to list all non-GPL source files at some
> place in the top-level directory. Does anybody object to putting this
> into COPYING?
If someone preps such complete listing of the licenses for parts of lush
code, I would be thankful if I am buzzed as well -- I will add them into
debian/copyright file (which had to be done originally anyways)

-- 
                                  .-.
=------------------------------   /v\  ----------------------------=
Keep in touch                    // \\     (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko              /(   )\               ICQ#: 60653192
                   Linux User    ^^-^^    [175555]



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/