Re: ANN: Lush 2.0 beta release

Raymond Martin <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:27:01 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.lush.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> 
> We actually got persmission from all the people we could think of.
> 
> We think a lot more people would use Lush in industrial contexts
> if we switched to the LGPL.
> 
>

Forgot to point out again. As it stands with the package as distributed,
it is indeed violating licenses because it does not have the proper
license header in all the files (C files, etc.). Just an "altered" GPL
one that cannot apply. All those headers must be changed before this
can be distributed. The headers are the only way for an end user to know
what license actually applies (read more on this at the FSF).

In accord with the rules of LGPL/GPL, distribution must cease at this point.

This issue has to be fixed first. And in the process consider adding the header
to many of the other files also (lush scripts, documentation, etc.).

Raymond



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference