Re: No Invert Functions?

"Michael A. Koerber" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.matlisp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> The problem with using only GESV and M/ is that it computes an LU
> decomposition (which is the major O(N^3) part of the work).  To use it
> again (e.g. in a time-stepping scheme) you need GETRS.
> 
Nicolas,

1.  I have no argument with this...I do have argument with implying that
    MATLISP does _not_ now use LU decomposition to compute inverses.

mike
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.