Re: two small issues

> Sorry!  No one had said anything, but perhaps I didn't give enough
> time.

I may have not been following the thread carefully enough.  I didn't
pickup on the :M proposed change.  

> We could do what Kent Pitman suggested on c.l.l a while back and
> change the matlisp package to be net.sourceforge.matlisp or
> net.sf.matlisp.  But I think matlisp is sufficiently unique that we
> don't have to do that.

It seems to me that :MATLISP is sufficient.

> Would it be acceptable to you if you just added 
> 
> (rename-package "MATLISP" "MATLISP" "M")

this works fine for me.

tnx

mike