Re: Matlisp subset in pure CL
Raymond Toy <[email protected]> Fri, 21 May 2004 12:03:07 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.matlisp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Neuss <[email protected]> writes: Nicolas> Raymond Toy <[email protected]> writes: Nicolas> 1. Use the CL-implemented version, if there is any, and if the matrices Nicolas> are small. >> >> And the nice thing is we can even get rid of the call overhead if the >> function could be inlined. That's a huge win for small >> matrices/vectors. >> >> Ray Nicolas> I have thought about this, but I am completely uncertain how to do such a Nicolas> thing in a well-behaved way within ANSI CL. The best thing would probably Nicolas> be to pay Gerd Moellmann for implementing method inlining in CMUCL. But According to the CMUCL User's manual, Section 2.23.4 says that effective methods can be inlined. Perhaps that is good enough. Ray ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click