Re: Matlisp subset in pure CL

Raymond Toy <[email protected]> Fri, 21 May 2004 12:03:07 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.matlisp.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Neuss <[email protected]> writes:

    Nicolas> Raymond Toy <[email protected]> writes:
    Nicolas> 1. Use the CL-implemented version, if there is any, and if the matrices
    Nicolas> are small.
    >> 
    >> And the nice thing is we can even get rid of the call overhead if the
    >> function could be inlined.  That's a huge win for small
    >> matrices/vectors. 
    >> 
    >> Ray

    Nicolas> I have thought about this, but I am completely uncertain how to do such a
    Nicolas> thing in a well-behaved way within ANSI CL.  The best thing would probably
    Nicolas> be to pay Gerd Moellmann for implementing method inlining in CMUCL.  But

According to the CMUCL User's manual, Section 2.23.4 says that
effective methods can be inlined.  Perhaps that is good enough.

Ray



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click