Re: Some questions (LAPACK source, QZ, Debian)
Raymond Toy <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Dec 2004 09:47:31 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.matlisp.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Neuss <[email protected]> writes: Nicolas> Nevertheless, it might be nice (and probably faster, if those routines are Nicolas> optimized) to use already installed libraries (e.g. from Debian packages). I think it should be straightforward to allow using precompiled libraries if they exist. As long as someone is willing to test it. :-) Nicolas> Are there important differences for the Matlisp version of LAPACK? I Nicolas> remember having read about small changes? I'd have to check logs to be sure, but LAPACK is basically what comes from netlib. There might have been one or two fixes applied for some bugs. Ray ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/