Re: Problem with function geev

Paul Ledbetter III wrote:
> I would like to know if the patch at the bottom of this email solves
> the geev problem for the other people who have reported it.  It solves
> mine.
[snip]
> The logical effect of this patch is to cause the LAPACK routines to
> assume the base of the machine is at least binary.
> 

Ah, thanks for digging into this.  A little googling finds the LAPACK 
FAQ (http://www.netlib.org/lapack/faq.html) which indicates that dlamch 
(and its dependent routines dlamc[1-5]) should be compiled without 
optimization?  Can you compile dlamch.f by hand without optimization and 
see if that makes a difference for you?

I'd really appreciate if you could, since I don't seem to have this 
problem on my linux boxes.

Thanks!

Ray



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf