Re: Question wrt interface to Allegro

>>>>> "AJ" == A J Rossini <A.J.> writes:

    AJ> My "right answer" to the "wrong question" (that you didn't ask).
    AJ> If you don't mind the potential overhead of CFFI, take a look at the
    AJ> cl-blapack (works, for BLAS and LAPACK) and/or lisp-matrix packages
    AJ> (concepts and code) for Fortran linking with CFFI.

On my list of things to do is replacing the existing FFI in matlisp
with a new version that calls CFFI instead.

And, I think, for the the existing supported Lisps, CFFI has no
additional overhead.  And then matlisp will be automagically support
more lisps than sbcl, cmucl, and Allegro.

I can't really debug the Allegro issue since I don't have Allegro.
Will the free Allegro version compile enough of matlisp for me to test
it?

Ray

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/