Re: Fwd: Cocoa IDE v1 project

Laughing Water <management-rz6JH/+NdlOVi9ERltrbYgC/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.mcl.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Toomas Altosaar wrote:

>> On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Alexander Repenning wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Gail Zacharias wrote:
>>>
>>>> In what ways is Fred better than our current editor?
>>>>
>>>
>>> full font support allowing useful things such as syntax  
>>> colorization.
>>>
>>
>> In more general terms, Fred provides good support for adding custom
>> features that improves it as a LISP developer editor.
>>
>> It could go further though. I've missed some capabilities in the
>> underlying datamodel. From work a few years back (so take my
>> recollection with a grain of salt) I found that it wasn't trivial to
>> make Fred hide content in a document (without deleting the text). I
>> was considering making a Fred extension to collapse e.g. a
>> function/class definition (or other LISP form) and leave just a
>> short clickable label/graphic in place. I missed being able to
>> insert non-character entities in the Fred document data sequence,
>> which would have facilitated many interesting developer enhancements
>> including the collapse feature mentioned above.
>>
>> -- Terje
>
> On the same theme: the ability to cut and paste graphical output of
> evaluated forms, e.g., graphs, charts, simulations, animations, etc.
> in some jpg/pdf/mov/etc format into and out of the editor would add
> much value to experimental and developmental work.
>
> For example, something similar to what Mathematica has been doing
> with their "notebook" editor for 20+ years already, but perhaps not
> in such an integrated manner (their output appears in the editor
> immediately below the evaluated form).
>
> Just the ability to copy and paste things other than text could be
> very useful, e.g., results of intricate/large tests that cannot be
> repeated without much (loading) time and (cpu) effort. It would be
> good to see the results right in the editor. What happens now is that
> a separate "report" needs to be written/remembered/referred to using
> some word processing software to save results.
>
> Would it be difficult to generalize the editor to handle things other
> than text, e.g., image, movies, etc.?

I believe PLT Scheme does this.

LW
_______________________________________________
info-mcl mailing list
[email protected]
http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.