Re: Fwd: Cocoa IDE v1 project
Laughing Water <management-rz6JH/+NdlOVi9ERltrbYgC/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.mcl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Feb 16, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Toomas Altosaar wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Alexander Repenning wrote: >> >>> On Feb 13, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Gail Zacharias wrote: >>> >>>> In what ways is Fred better than our current editor? >>>> >>> >>> full font support allowing useful things such as syntax >>> colorization. >>> >> >> In more general terms, Fred provides good support for adding custom >> features that improves it as a LISP developer editor. >> >> It could go further though. I've missed some capabilities in the >> underlying datamodel. From work a few years back (so take my >> recollection with a grain of salt) I found that it wasn't trivial to >> make Fred hide content in a document (without deleting the text). I >> was considering making a Fred extension to collapse e.g. a >> function/class definition (or other LISP form) and leave just a >> short clickable label/graphic in place. I missed being able to >> insert non-character entities in the Fred document data sequence, >> which would have facilitated many interesting developer enhancements >> including the collapse feature mentioned above. >> >> -- Terje > > On the same theme: the ability to cut and paste graphical output of > evaluated forms, e.g., graphs, charts, simulations, animations, etc. > in some jpg/pdf/mov/etc format into and out of the editor would add > much value to experimental and developmental work. > > For example, something similar to what Mathematica has been doing > with their "notebook" editor for 20+ years already, but perhaps not > in such an integrated manner (their output appears in the editor > immediately below the evaluated form). > > Just the ability to copy and paste things other than text could be > very useful, e.g., results of intricate/large tests that cannot be > repeated without much (loading) time and (cpu) effort. It would be > good to see the results right in the editor. What happens now is that > a separate "report" needs to be written/remembered/referred to using > some word processing software to save results. > > Would it be difficult to generalize the editor to handle things other > than text, e.g., image, movies, etc.? I believe PLT Scheme does this. LW _______________________________________________ info-mcl mailing list [email protected] http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl