Re: process crash

Terje Norderhaug <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.mcl.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Aug 3, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Alexander Repenning wrote:
> Would people mind/object/protest/welcome if RMCL would be checked  
> into Google Code? It would make updating and tracking RMCL (via  
> svn) quite a bit simpler.

I would very much like having RMCL in a revision control system. Some  
of us in the MCL community have already been discussing it privately  
in recent weeks.

> I doubt there will be many changes but even just a handful of  
> updates would be tricky to track as diff fragments distributed in  
> various emails.

I have more than a handful of changes I'd like to make myself, so I  
would prefer a system that encourages development. One major  
undertaking is to merge in some or many of the advances in MCL 5.2.

SVN may not be the best choice for our purposes. Maybe we should  
consider using a distributed/decentralized revision control system  
for RMCL?

-- Terje Norderhaug







_______________________________________________
info-mcl mailing list
[email protected]
http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.