Re: process crash
Terje Norderhaug <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.mcl.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Aug 3, 2009, at 11:02 AM, Alexander Repenning wrote: > Would people mind/object/protest/welcome if RMCL would be checked > into Google Code? It would make updating and tracking RMCL (via > svn) quite a bit simpler. I would very much like having RMCL in a revision control system. Some of us in the MCL community have already been discussing it privately in recent weeks. > I doubt there will be many changes but even just a handful of > updates would be tricky to track as diff fragments distributed in > various emails. I have more than a handful of changes I'd like to make myself, so I would prefer a system that encourages development. One major undertaking is to merge in some or many of the advances in MCL 5.2. SVN may not be the best choice for our purposes. Maybe we should consider using a distributed/decentralized revision control system for RMCL? -- Terje Norderhaug _______________________________________________ info-mcl mailing list [email protected] http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/info-mcl