Re: Requesting some tips
James Crippen <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:38:49 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.movitz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 25/07/05, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I read and agree with Rex Walburn's email. Some kind of user guide sounds like a > great idea. I agree. However... > I used lisp in a AI course in my last college semester. We did not explore the > language very deeply. We covered the basics to be able to do some AI > programming in reactive agents, search agents, learning agents, genetic > programming, etc. So my knowledge of lisp is fairly limited. Movitz is almost certainly *not* the best way to start exploring Lisp. Not that it's poorly written or anything like that, it's just so low-level that many tasks are tedious and difficult. And Movitz still lacks support for much of the Common Lisp language, much less any extensive user interfaces. It doesn't have a simple way to manage files, lacks a graphical interface, has no support for anything beyond the most basic hardware functionality, and has no applications of any kind, not even a functioning text editor. (A working emacs may appear in the not too distant future). Exploring Lisp with Movitz will probably result in hours of frustration as you encounter Common Lisp functionality which is still unimplemented. You'll spend your time writing half-functional code to do things which should be standard functions from the language. It's like going on a pleasure hike only to find that you have to blaze your own trail, cut trees, pull stumps, lay gravel, and build your own bridges---too much like work. If you want to explore things with Lisp I recommend instead working with one of the other free CL systems that is in wide use. Don't forget about Movitz, but it's not a good place to start with Lisp. If you're still seriously interested in Movitz after my little lecture then you should still spend some time hacking with and on another Lisp system first. Experience with CLISP, CMUCL, SBCL, or any other good Common Lisp implementation is necessary to understand what Movitz still lacks in CL support. Studying these for implementation techniques is important if you're interested in adding to Movitz's runtime. Of particular value is understanding Lisp compilation techniques, and extending the Movitz compiler to the point where it can compile itself. > Anyway I love the language and am always trying to think about fun things to do > in lisp. Check out http://www.cliki.net/ for many other interesting and fun Lispy things. > When someone told me about Movitz that gave me an idea. I would like > to do something memory managment related, schedulling, stuff like that, and > Movitz seems the perfect way to do so. To that purpose I need some pointers as > I honestly haven't the slightest idea where to begin. Doing these sort of low level operating system programming jobs requires quite a bit of knowledge of the hardware architecture as well as an understanding of implementation techniques. If you're really interested in this I recommend you spend some time reading through Intel's hardware architecture documentation (they'll send you the hardcopy books for free), then study the Movitz assembler and the existing code. I've done the same, and still haven't gotten far enough along to write anything contributable. Writing a guide for these sorts of tasks is somewhat unrealistic, because it entails writing documentation about the entire system, which is in any case a moving target. However, if you're really interested in learning how Movitz works and want to see some documentation, why don't you study the source and keep notes? Then you and others can easily build documentation from that. Ask lots of questions on this list, and everyone will benefit from the answers.