Re: 2 short, ip/udp related questions
"Antonis Antoniadis" <[email protected]> Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:04:36 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.movitz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 6/22/08, Robert Swindells <[email protected]> wrote: > > You wrote: > >1. What is the way to send packets of some given protocol to movitz? > > > There isn't really a single way to generate protocol traffic. > > Which protocol do you want to try ? > I wanted to try icmp, udp and tcp, to see if function ip input works for all cases. Most important though for now would be udp. Should I implement tftp before udp? > > >2. I also asked this in the blog, do you think that after udp is > >working, it's worth the time/effort to create some way to transfer > >changes to a running movitz using udp? On one hand it will make > >development easier, but on the other hand I'll (try to) write tcp > >anyway also. > > > Where is your blog ? The link you sent me just gives a blank page. > I am not sure whether I had to change the port for some reason after sending the link, although I don't think so. Anyway, going to www.recursively.org, and pressing the blog link from there, always works, except in the seldom cases that the server is down. > I would think about making movitz be in control of any transfer > protocol and to use something that already exists so that you only > need to write one side of it. > > The simplest protocol to implement would be TFTP. > Do I understand this correct, that you mean implement tftp to transfer the changes, and don't bother more with udp (for this purpose of course)? > > Robert > Thanks a lot for the fast reply, Antonis