Re: OS decisions
[email protected] (Frode V. Fjeld) Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:50:48 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.movitz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Robert Swindells <[email protected]> writes: > The interrupt handling sequence might benefit from some changes too, > I guess you could install a closure as the handler but it could be > simpler to pass some object as an argument to the handler function. As of now there's two mechanisms for setting up interrupt handlers. The lower-level one is pretty much exactly the setting of the vector in the CPU's handler table (I forget the name). They are now all being set to the default interrupt trampoline, which implements the second configuration level: The calling of any lisp function, as specified by the "exception-handler" accessor. > to pass some object as an argument to the handler function. I don't quite understand what you mean by this? -- Frode V. Fjeld