Re: compiling LiCE for Movitz
Ram Vedam <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:21:10 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.movitz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1825953505== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5971b4f53290478e75571 --001636c5971b4f53290478e75571 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Have there been any attempts at writing a filesystem for Movitz? I think that LiCE would definitely compile with no adjustment to Shawn's source if there was a filesystem on Movitz, since it would mean that those macros / functions associated with file I/O would have been implemented. In retrospect, I guess I should have started with that first. I haven't seen any references to an attempted filesystem inside the Movitz source, but I may be looking in the wrong place. Ram On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Andreas Davour <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Ram Vedam wrote: > > I don't know if there is a lice-devel mailing list so I thought I post >> this >> here and get pointed in the right direction. I downloaded and tried >> compiling LiCE for movitz, but it would seem that the new version requires >> a >> couple of macros to be implemented inside Movitz before it can >> successfully >> hook into it. My question is: has anyone tried compiling the new version >> of >> LiCE on the movitz platform and if so what sort of issues are you having? >> Currently, I'm compiling a movitz image using SBCL and it is complaining >> that "WITH-OPEN-FILE is not implemented yet". Is anyone else having this >> problem? >> > > This list have been really quiet for a long time now. Hopefully somebody > come out and give some feedback on your problem. Personally I don't have > much experience to share. Shawn Betts is, I believe the originator or LiCE > so maybe he knows something. > > I actually started to delve deeper into the heart of movitz to develop some > of the more interesting parts, but I got lost in the source. I don't have > much talent and experience navigating a source maze. > > /andreas > > -- > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > --001636c5971b4f53290478e75571 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Have there been any attempts at writing a filesystem for Movitz? I think th= at LiCE would definitely compile with no adjustment to Shawn's source i= f there was a filesystem on Movitz, since it would mean that those macros /= functions associated with file I/O would have been implemented. In retrosp= ect, I guess I should have started with that first. I haven't seen any = references to an attempted filesystem inside the Movitz source, but I may b= e looking in the wrong place.<br> <br>Ram<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 1:34 PM, = Andreas Davour <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:[email protected]" t= arget=3D"_blank">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cla= ss=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); marg= in: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> <div><div></div><div>On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Ram Vedam wrote:<br> <br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, = 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> I don't know if there is a lice-devel mailing list so I thought I post = this<br> here and get pointed in the right direction. I downloaded and tried<br> compiling LiCE for movitz, but it would seem that the new version requires = a<br> couple of macros to be implemented inside Movitz before it can successfully= <br> hook into it. My question is: has anyone tried compiling the new version of= <br> LiCE on the movitz platform and if so what sort of issues are you having?<b= r> Currently, I'm compiling a movitz image using SBCL and it is complainin= g<br> that "WITH-OPEN-FILE is not implemented yet". Is anyone else havi= ng this<br> problem?<br> </blockquote> <br></div></div> This list have been really quiet for a long time now. Hopefully somebody co= me out and give some feedback on your problem. Personally I don't have = much experience to share. Shawn Betts is, I believe the originator or LiCE = so maybe he knows something.<br> <br> I actually started to delve deeper into the heart of movitz to develop some= of the more interesting parts, but I got lost in the source. I don't h= ave much talent and experience navigating a source maze.<br> <br> /andreas<br><font color=3D"#888888"> <br> -- <br> A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.<br> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?<br> A: Top-posting.<br> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?<br> </font></blockquote></div><br> --001636c5971b4f53290478e75571-- --===============1825953505== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline