Re: compiling LiCE for Movitz
Ram Vedam <[email protected]> Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:27:20 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.movitz.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============2087182141== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e644c18e1642480478e9ef4e --0016e644c18e1642480478e9ef4e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I found the tmp directory with an ext2fs implementation. I'm just starting to look at it. Ram On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Andreas Davour <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Ram Vedam wrote: > > Have there been any attempts at writing a filesystem for Movitz? I think >> that LiCE would definitely compile with no adjustment to Shawn's source if >> there was a filesystem on Movitz, since it would mean that those macros / >> functions associated with file I/O would have been implemented. In >> retrospect, I guess I should have started with that first. I haven't seen >> any references to an attempted filesystem inside the Movitz source, but I >> may be looking in the wrong place. >> > > There used to be a tmp directory with some stuff about ext3. I haven't > checked out the source in a long time, since I dropped out of lisp for a > while. My source is two computers (generations!) away... > > Filesystems was exactly what I was about to do for movitz, and other have > also tried. It sure would be nice to have. I have so much to do these days, > but if I could get the lisp bug again I think some basis could be laid quite > easy. > > > /andreas > > -- > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > --0016e644c18e1642480478e9ef4e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I found the tmp directory with an ext2fs implementation. I'm just start= ing to look at it. <br><br>Ram<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, No= v 21, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Andreas Davour <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mail= to:[email protected]">[email protected]</a>></span> wrote:<br> <blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, = 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class=3D"im"= >On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Ram Vedam wrote:<br> <br> </div><div class=3D"im"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-l= eft: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left:= 1ex;"> Have there been any attempts at writing a filesystem for Movitz? I think<br= > that LiCE would definitely compile with no adjustment to Shawn's source= if<br> there was a filesystem on Movitz, since it would mean that those macros /<b= r> functions associated with file I/O would have been implemented. In<br> retrospect, I guess I should have started with that first. I haven't se= en<br> any references to an attempted filesystem inside the Movitz source, but I<b= r> may be looking in the wrong place.<br> </blockquote> <br></div> There used to be a tmp directory with some stuff about ext3. I haven't = checked out the source in a long time, since I dropped out of lisp for a wh= ile. My source is two computers (generations!) away...<br> <br> Filesystems was exactly what I was about to do for movitz, and other have a= lso tried. It sure would be nice to have. I have so much to do these days, = but if I could get the lisp bug again I think some basis could be laid quit= e easy.<div> <div></div><div class=3D"h5"><br> <br> /andreas<br> <br> -- <br> A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.<br> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?<br> A: Top-posting.<br> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?<br> </div></div></blockquote></div><br> --0016e644c18e1642480478e9ef4e-- --===============2087182141== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline