RE: Question about NFS
"Keith Barr" <[email protected]> Sat, 10 May 2003 12:22:13 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.open-source.franz |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ahmon, Thanks so much...it works perfectly. To get a fix 16 minutes after my request is nothing short of amazing! Great work. Thanks again, Keith -----Original Message----- From: Ahmon Dancy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sat 5/10/2003 9:29 AM To: Keith Barr Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: Question about NFS Keith, please grab ftp://ftp.franz.com/pri/dancy/nfs-1.1.3.zip and see if it works better for you. I made a minor change which I believe will fix you up. >> Hi all, >> >> I am in the process of trying to get Allegro NFSd to work to replace >> Microsoft's Services for Unix, which runs okay on Win2000, but I can't >> get it to work with XP. My problem is that the device that is mounting >> the NFS drive is a VxWorks-based system, and it seems to be very picky >> about working-basically, I am admitting that Allegro may work fine and >> VxWorks may not, but I am looking for suggestions regardless. >> >> The problem is that when VxWorks starts up it does something along the >> lines of a showmount -e on the PC running NFS, but it doesn't seem to be >> getting any info back. When I run the command on a linux box I do see a >> different behavior between Allegro and SFU, and I am wondering if there >> is anyway that I can make Allegro conform without getting into the >> source code? >> >> When I run showmount -e PCwithSFU I get: >> >> /CLIPR (everyone) <---- Services for UNIX result >> >> When I run showmount -e PCwithAllegro I get: >> >> /CLIPR * <---- Allegro NFSd result >> >> I am guessing this difference is causing the problem...any ideas? >> >> Thanks in advance for whatever help you can provide...other than this, >> Allegro seems much easier to use than SFU. >> >> Keith Barr >> Software Discipline Manager >> Coherent Technologies, Inc.