Re: slime

the problems seem to arise from the call to
swank-backend::maybe-method-location.  removing that
from find-definitions seems to work.

maybe it was solving a problem that is no longer
present?

     ...bryan


On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:00 PM, Gary Byers wrote:
>
>> one more thing that we should ensure works properly with
>> 0.14.4 is slime.
>>
>> the only breakage that i've noticed is slime-edit-definition
>> (M-.) with methods.
>>
>> adding some missing types (funcallable-standard-class) to the
>> etypecase in swank::specializer-name will fix it for some
>> methods.  others, like documentation, still don't work.
>>
>> i'm not sure if this is strictly a slime problem with 0.14.4
>> or something with 0.14.4 itself.
>>
>>    ...bryan
>>
>>
>
> I'm not sure what would have changed in pre-0.14.4 that would have  
> affected
> this.
>
> The quasi-standard (not really documented, but it's the basis of what
> ILISP uses) interface is CCL::%SOURCE-FILES; calling
>
> ? (CCL::%SOURCE-FILES 'DOCUMENTATION)
>
> seems to return essentially the same information in 0.14.3 and in the
> current bleeding-edge version.
>
> A lot of DOCUMENTATION methods have EQL specializers.  Is that  
> significant ?
>
> I'll download SLIME, and see if I can remember how to invoke and  
> use it ...
>
>