Naming convention for character-encodings: utf32 vs. :utf-32
Ralf Stoye <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:59:16 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.openmcl.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 29.09.2007 um 21:08 schrieb Gary Byers: > You're right that "big endian utf 32" should be called "utf-32be" > and likewise for the little-endian variant. I'll change that. The "le" version is still called utf32-le: http://trac.clozure.com/openmcl/browser/trunk/source/level-1/l1-unicode.lisp#L4253 (define-character-encoding #+big-endian-target :utf-32be #-big-endian- target :utf32-le (maybe) should be changed to (define-character-encoding #+big-endian-target :utf-32be #-big-endian- target :utf-32le