Re: freshly built wx86cl64.exe crashes on start

Bharat Shetty <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.openmcl.devel
Message-ID <CA+6VBw6OsjsT98XbmQkTcs7PFChyRfaoTD4eM3=cX_7eXeHqBw@mail.gmail.com>
Unfortunately yes in low memory for now. But as I pointed earlier there
might be issues with heap locations as well (windows handling FTH).

Regards,
Bharat

On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:27 AM R. Matthew Emerson <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> > On Jan 4, 2023, at 3:15 PM, Bharat Shetty <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Since two days wx86cl64.exe has been behaving erratically (both the
> version i downloaded and built using gccv4.7.1) it has been crashing
> randomly at startup and emacs is unable to start it with slime. I suspect
> this might be to do with some security patches installed.
> >
> > So I looked into the windows security controls. Turns out windows
> defender lets us configure "exploit protection setting" by configuring the
> following parameters
> >     •
> > control flow guard CFG
> >     • Data Execution Prevention DEP
> >     • Mandatory ASLR (force randomisation for images - force relocation
> of images not compiled with Bottom-up ASLR ) -- off by default for now
> >     • Randomise memory allocation (Bottom-up ASLR) -- on by default
> >     • High Entropy ASLR - needs Bottom-up ASLR to be ON
> >     • validate execution chains (SEHOP)
> >     • validate heap integrity - terminate process when heap corruption
> os detected
> >
> > I observed we can get wxcl8664 to run with 'Mandatory ASLR' and 'High
> Entropy ASLR' turned off and with all other options enabled. So even if gcc
> were to enable us to build non PIE position independant executable, it is
> just a matter of time before no-pie apps and ccl stops running on windows.
> >
> > The only way we can keep ccl running is making the code relocatable
> (PIE) at the earliest. The bright spot is it still runs on linux :)
>
> The x86 port of CCL uses absolute addresses to reference code and other
> data in low memory. Is this what the problem is?
>
> Changing that would be a big hassle.
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.