Re: The M1 port and the future of CCL

Bharat Shetty <[email protected]> Sat, 25 Nov 2023 01:37:04 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.openmcl.devel
Message-ID <CA+6VBw45ESvQBEAtCDfGmfDACX10SOVDf44z87-br1PD9W09Ng@mail.gmail.com>
I dont have a M1 or M2 anything mac. I use ccl on windows and linux. And i
think there is value in ccl beyond the (mac) gui.

On Sat, 25 Nov 2023, 01:00 Jon Boone, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Perhaps I’m mistaken, but given the Mac platform will continue to be a
> moving target, isn’t more than a question of an initial port to aarch64,
> but also ongoing development (switching fit integration, keeping the IDE up
> to par with whatever UI Guideline changes happen, etc?
>
> Is there a sufficient community to provide the necessary testing/debugging
> of patches and how does this become a stable community supported project?
>
> — jb
> On Nov 24, 2023 at 14:03 -0500, Mark Klein <[email protected]>, wrote:
>
> I'd contribute $$$ to a port as well. I use CCL on a Mac a *lot* and it
> sounds like it would be a real pain to switch to some other CL.
>
> Anyone have a rough idea of how much porting CCL would cost?
>
> Mark
>
> ----------------------
> Mark Klein, PhD
> Principal Research Scientist
> Massachusetts Institute of Technology
> http://cci.mit.edu/klein/
>
>
>
>