Re: Internet address conflict between namespace and local.boot file

Robert Coquereaux <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:42:43 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.lisp.org.slug
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le samedi, 27 sep 2003, =E0 22:06 Europe/Paris, Benjamin Benninghofen a=20
=E9crit :

>
>
>
>     I could certainly change this again in the namespace and=20
> simultaneously
>     edit the  local.boot file  typing  a command
>     of the kind Set Network Address a-local-internet-number, but,=20
> somehow,
>     this looks strange.
>     It is probably not the right way of doing things...
>
> Why does it look strange to change the address in the Namespace and
> in the Boot-File ? This should be the correct way of using the same
> Lisp-World on several machines that are not Namespace-Servers.

Yes, I understand the logic but since I have only one machine I would=20
have expected
the Set Network Address command  in the boot file to be unnecessary=20
(after all, I could very well be
totally disconnected from all possible networks!)
Nevertheless  I cannot boot the machine when I do not issue explicitly=20
this command
"Set Network Address an-internet-number" with a number matching the=20
namespace descriptor.


>
> Since you have exactly one LispM at home it is probably a Namespace
> Server. I would in that case boot the Distribution-World and use
> "Define Site" to define a completely new namespace containing the
> 2 hosts to be connected. Then the desired additional software (e.g.
> Macsyma) can be loaded again and a new customized Lisp-World can
> be saved.
>

This sounds perfectly reasonable... but it happens that I have spent=20
countless hours,
years ago, to load many symbolic packages into my own "complete world".
In many cases  (like those of Joshua,  Concordia or Plexi or...) the=20
installation
was rather difficult, in the sense that many of the paths expected by=20
the installation program
were not existing, mayne they were not made for a Mac Ivory
and I had to do many fixes, by hand. I have of course completely=20
forgotten now
how I managed to do it, but I remember that it took a long time.
Therefore I hate the idea of doing that again. It is true that I do not=20
use all these programs very often,
and I could be happy without loading all of them again (or using them),=20
but... when you are in a museum, you
like to see the paintings on display... and are not fully satisfied if=20
you just know that they are safelty stored in the basement!
This is the reason why would like to use my perfectly working "complete=20
world", and just change the ethernet address.
After all, rather than bringing my machine at home, I could, as well,=20
have moved to another institute, with a different
IP address.  I understand that it would then be also logic to create a=20
totally new namespace and site, but
would it be also necessary to start again from the Distribution-World=20
and rebuild all my favorite worlds ?
This looks strange to me. Isn't there a way out ?


>
>     Worse, several program requiring a password (like Macsyma)  no=20
> longer
>     work (of course, the password was
>     given for MyIvory but the same machine now recognizes itself as
>     Internet|xxx.xxx.x;xx)
>
> It it interesting to see that you are using Macsyma under Genera,
> because some years ago Richard Petti from Macsyma Inc told me that
> I would be the only person who wants to use Macsyma under Genera.

Well...You are not.
However to tell you the truth, I am no longer using it as much as I was
using it in the past. Actually, at some point in the past,  I was=20
dreaming of
establishing a communication by RPC  between Macsyma running under=20
Genera
and some other math program (like Mathematica) running on the Mac side=20
of
my MacII-FX host, but I finally  gave up, mostly because my MacII=20
became obsolete, from the
Apple point of view, and since nobody seemed to be able to  install an=20
Ivory processor on the newer machines.
This is sad.


>
> However when you change the address of your Symbolics then you
> will need a new Macsyma Key anyway.

Ah... Yes ? How dos this key check work ?

>  Furthermore you should be
> sure that you got the machine including the Macsyma License.

I did.
I got the release 416.15 about  nine years ago from Symbolics France.=20
Yes... It existed at that time!
This was actally an upgrade of my previous version of Macsyma.

> Altough Macsyma Inc is now in "cold store" the owner of Macsyma
> Inc still insists in the license agreements. When you own the
> Macsyma License you could contact Symbolics Inc for a new key
> if you cannot determine it yourself.
>

Symbolics ? You mean Symbolics Inc or Macsyma Inc ?
I have no idea where to contact Symbolics Inc !
I though it had disappeared...
Can you elaborate ?

Robert Coquereaux