Re: Internet address conflict between namespace and local.boot file
Robert Coquereaux <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Sep 2003 01:42:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.org.slug |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Le samedi, 27 sep 2003, =E0 22:06 Europe/Paris, Benjamin Benninghofen a=20 =E9crit : > > > > I could certainly change this again in the namespace and=20 > simultaneously > edit the local.boot file typing a command > of the kind Set Network Address a-local-internet-number, but,=20 > somehow, > this looks strange. > It is probably not the right way of doing things... > > Why does it look strange to change the address in the Namespace and > in the Boot-File ? This should be the correct way of using the same > Lisp-World on several machines that are not Namespace-Servers. Yes, I understand the logic but since I have only one machine I would=20 have expected the Set Network Address command in the boot file to be unnecessary=20 (after all, I could very well be totally disconnected from all possible networks!) Nevertheless I cannot boot the machine when I do not issue explicitly=20 this command "Set Network Address an-internet-number" with a number matching the=20 namespace descriptor. > > Since you have exactly one LispM at home it is probably a Namespace > Server. I would in that case boot the Distribution-World and use > "Define Site" to define a completely new namespace containing the > 2 hosts to be connected. Then the desired additional software (e.g. > Macsyma) can be loaded again and a new customized Lisp-World can > be saved. > This sounds perfectly reasonable... but it happens that I have spent=20 countless hours, years ago, to load many symbolic packages into my own "complete world". In many cases (like those of Joshua, Concordia or Plexi or...) the=20 installation was rather difficult, in the sense that many of the paths expected by=20 the installation program were not existing, mayne they were not made for a Mac Ivory and I had to do many fixes, by hand. I have of course completely=20 forgotten now how I managed to do it, but I remember that it took a long time. Therefore I hate the idea of doing that again. It is true that I do not=20 use all these programs very often, and I could be happy without loading all of them again (or using them),=20 but... when you are in a museum, you like to see the paintings on display... and are not fully satisfied if=20 you just know that they are safelty stored in the basement! This is the reason why would like to use my perfectly working "complete=20 world", and just change the ethernet address. After all, rather than bringing my machine at home, I could, as well,=20 have moved to another institute, with a different IP address. I understand that it would then be also logic to create a=20 totally new namespace and site, but would it be also necessary to start again from the Distribution-World=20 and rebuild all my favorite worlds ? This looks strange to me. Isn't there a way out ? > > Worse, several program requiring a password (like Macsyma) no=20 > longer > work (of course, the password was > given for MyIvory but the same machine now recognizes itself as > Internet|xxx.xxx.x;xx) > > It it interesting to see that you are using Macsyma under Genera, > because some years ago Richard Petti from Macsyma Inc told me that > I would be the only person who wants to use Macsyma under Genera. Well...You are not. However to tell you the truth, I am no longer using it as much as I was using it in the past. Actually, at some point in the past, I was=20 dreaming of establishing a communication by RPC between Macsyma running under=20 Genera and some other math program (like Mathematica) running on the Mac side=20 of my MacII-FX host, but I finally gave up, mostly because my MacII=20 became obsolete, from the Apple point of view, and since nobody seemed to be able to install an=20 Ivory processor on the newer machines. This is sad. > > However when you change the address of your Symbolics then you > will need a new Macsyma Key anyway. Ah... Yes ? How dos this key check work ? > Furthermore you should be > sure that you got the machine including the Macsyma License. I did. I got the release 416.15 about nine years ago from Symbolics France.=20 Yes... It existed at that time! This was actally an upgrade of my previous version of Macsyma. > Altough Macsyma Inc is now in "cold store" the owner of Macsyma > Inc still insists in the license agreements. When you own the > Macsyma License you could contact Symbolics Inc for a new key > if you cannot determine it yourself. > Symbolics ? You mean Symbolics Inc or Macsyma Inc ? I have no idea where to contact Symbolics Inc ! I though it had disappeared... Can you elaborate ? Robert Coquereaux