Re: Upcoming release 2.11
Klaus Harbo <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:28:10 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.lisp.plob.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Heiko Kirschke <[email protected]> writes: > Well, I think that if an API does not constrain the possibilities of > the language using the API, it fairly does not mind how this API is > implemented (is this an `extensional interface'?). I've tried to use > this approach when coding Plob. > >>But don't you think this mailing list is the right forum for this >> kind >>of discussion? >> =20 >> > *This* kind of discussion is ok. What I meant is I don't want to discus= s > here e.g. technical details about the persistent heap layers API or > things like that. `Strategic' discussions like the ones we had about > how the further development of Plob could be done are necessary and > therefore completely ok (as long as the readers don't start to > unsubscribe ...) > > Viele Gr=FC=DFe, Heiko > FWIW, I'm quite interested in this subject as well, so I would like to see the discussion stay 'on the list', at least until the discussions get to a very high volume! -Klaus. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D6595&alloc_id=3D14396&op=3Dclick